首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative ergonomic workflow and user experience analysis of MRI versus fluoroscopy-guided vascular interventions:an iliac angioplasty exemplar case study
【2h】

Comparative ergonomic workflow and user experience analysis of MRI versus fluoroscopy-guided vascular interventions:an iliac angioplasty exemplar case study

机译:MRI与透视引导下的血管介入治疗的比较人体工程学工作流程和用户体验分析:an血管成形术的案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose A methodological framework is introduced to assess and compare a conventional fluoroscopy protocol for peripheral angioplasty with a new magnetic resonant imaging (MRI)-guided protocol. Different scenarios were considered during interventions on a perfused arterial phantom with regard to time-based and cognitive task analysis, user experience and ergonomics. Methods Three clinicians with different expertise performed a total of 43 simulated common iliac angioplasties (9 fluoroscopic, 34 MRI-guided) in two blocks of sessions. Six different configurations for MRI guidance were tested in the first block. Four of them were evaluated in the second block and compared to the fluoroscopy protocol. Relevant stages’ durations were collected, and interventions were audio-visually recorded from different perspectives. A cued retrospective protocol analysis (CRPA) was undertaken, including personal interviews. In addition, ergonomic constraints in the MRI suite were evaluated. Results Significant differences were found when comparing the performance between MRI configurations versus fluoroscopy. Two configurations [with times of 8.56 (0.64) and 9.48 (1.13) min] led to reduce procedure time for MRI guidance, comparable to fluoroscopy [8.49 (0.75) min]. The CRPA pointed out the main influential factors for clinical procedure performance. The ergonomic analysis quantified musculoskeletal risks for interventional radiologists when utilising MRI. Several alternatives were suggested to prevent potential low-back injuries. Conclusions This work presents a step towards the implementation of efficient operational protocols for MRI-guided procedures based on an integral and multidisciplinary framework, applicable to the assessment of current vascular protocols. The use of first-user perspective raises the possibility of establishing new forms of clinical training and education.
机译:目的引入一种方法框架,以评估和比较用于外周血管成形术的常规荧光检查方案与新的磁共振成像(MRI)指导的方案。在基于时间和认知任务分析,用户体验和人体工程学的灌注动脉体模干预期间,考虑了不同的场景。方法3名不同专业的临床医生分两节进行了总共43例模拟的common总血管成形术(9例透视,34例MRI引导)。在第一个模块中测试了六种不同的MRI引导配置。在第二个步骤中评估了其中四个,并将其与荧光检查方案进行了比较。收集了相关阶段的持续时间,并从不同角度以视听方式记录了干预措施。进行了提示性回顾性协议分析(CRPA),包括个人访谈。此外,评估了MRI套件中的人体工程学约束。结果当比较MRI配置与荧光检查的性能时发现了显着差异。两种配置[时间分别为8.56(0.64 min)和9.48(1.13 min)分钟]可以减少MRI指导的手术时间,与荧光检查法[8.49(0.75)min]相当。 CRPA指出了影响临床程序性能的主要因素。人体工程学分析定量了使用MRI时介入放射科医生的肌肉骨骼风险。建议了几种替代方法,以防止潜在的下背部受伤。结论这项工作为基于MRI指导的程序实施有效的操作规程迈出了一步,该规程基于一个完整的,多学科的框架,适用于评估当前的血管规程。使用第一手资料的观点增加了建立新形式的临床培训和教育的可能性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号